I have sent the following letter to the Editor of Science (note: I sent my analysis to the lead author of the study - Jason Abaluck - before making the report public and the report contains some changes following communication with him).
Dear Sir/Madam
You recently published the article "Impact of community masking on COVID-19: A cluster-randomized trial in Bangladesh”. Science, 375(6577), eabi9069. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi9069 by Abaluck et al which contained the summary statement:
“A randomized-trial of community-level mask promotion in rural Bangladesh during COVID-19 shows that the intervention tripled mask usage and reduced symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections, demonstrating that promoting community mask-wearing can improve public health.”
As explained in the attached report, this statement grossly exaggerates the actual findings of the study and – unsurprisingly - has been widely used by the media to argue that the study provides the most convincing evidence yet of the effectiveness of masks in preventing covid-19 transmission and infection. More worryingly, the article has been cited explicitly to justify continuing or reintroducing aspects of mask mandates in the USA, UK and elsewhere. Because the paper provides no evidence that mask wearing reduces covid transmission or infections, it needs to be corrected or withdrawn.
Yours sincerely
Professor Norman Fenton
The next set of documents — an expected 80,000 pages — is scheduled to be released on or before May 1.
The Defender
Me: “Pfizer hired about 600 “additional” full-time employees to process adverse event reports during the three months following authorization of its COVID-19 vaccine, with plans to hire 1,800 more by June 2021, newly released documents reveal.”
How many employees did they have to start with (say 500), before adding a further 600 with plans to hire 1,800 more by June 2021 = Say 500 + 600 + 1,800 = 2.900 to record adverse effects of its Pfizer vaccines by June 2021 – like WOW!!
So how many people are employed by VAERS to record Pfizer and all…
The sole purpose of mask and masking is to scare people into getting their Covid jabs and once the synthetic mRNA gene vaccines are in, there is no way to get them out, so they do whatever they do to the human body from the inside out - and then there is this: The Hydrogel patent US8415325B2 is listed in the Moderna patent, here. Hydrogels are also mentioned in a second Moderna patent, here. Hydrogel is listed in the Johnson & Johnson patent, here. Hydrogels are made from Graphene Oxide. Nobody can deny the evidence that Graphene Oxide is in the shots.
GMO HUMANS
All the Covid-19 “vaccine” patents mention gene deletion. All the patents except one, mention “complimentary DNA”…